On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:23:49PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:57:26PM +0800, Zhouping Liu wrote: > > > On 07/18/2013 01:00 PM, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.10-stable tree. > > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > Its prerequisite patch is: > > > 7c4c3a0f18b hrtimers: Support resuming with two or more CPUs online (but > > > stopped) > > > how about also back-port this patch? > > > > I could do that, but from reading the changelog comments below, is this > > patch really needed for 3.10-stable? 3.11 seems to make sense, as some > > other code was using this api and causing problems, but that isn't in > > 3.10 from what I can tell, right? > > > > So, is it really needed for 3.10? > > The issue itself (smp function call from softirq context) needs to be > fixed in older kernels as well. Backport w/o the XEN dependency below. Thanks for the backport, I'll queue it up for the next release after this one. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html