This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: KVM: Take S1 walks into account when determining S2 write faults
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm64-kvm-take-s1-walks-into-account-when-determining-s2-write-faults.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 60e21a0ef54cd836b9eb22c7cb396989b5b11648 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:37:01 +0100
Subject: arm64: KVM: Take S1 walks into account when determining S2 write faults
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
commit 60e21a0ef54cd836b9eb22c7cb396989b5b11648 upstream.
The WnR bit in the HSR/ESR_EL2 indicates whether a data abort was
generated by a read or a write instruction. For stage 2 data aborts
generated by a stage 1 translation table walk (i.e. the actual page
table access faults at EL2), the WnR bit therefore reports whether the
instruction generating the walk was a load or a store, *not* whether the
page table walker was reading or writing the entry.
For page tables marked as read-only at stage 2 (e.g. due to KSM merging
them with the tables from another guest), this could result in livelock,
where a page table walk generated by a load instruction attempts to
set the access flag in the stage 1 descriptor, but fails to trigger
CoW in the host since only a read fault is reported.
This patch modifies the arm64 kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite function to
take into account stage 2 faults in stage 1 walks. Since DBM cannot be
disabled at EL2 for CPUs that implement it, we assume that these faults
are always causes by writes, avoiding the livelock situation at the
expense of occasional, spurious CoWs.
We could, in theory, do a bit better by checking the guest TCR
configuration and inspecting the page table to see why the PTE faulted.
However, I doubt this is measurable in practice, and the threat of
livelock is real.
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -167,11 +167,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_isvalid
return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_ISV);
}
-static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WNR);
-}
-
static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_issext(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_SSE);
@@ -192,6 +187,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(
return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_S1PTW);
}
+static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WNR) ||
+ kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(vcpu); /* AF/DBM update */
+}
+
static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_is_cm(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_CM);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from will.deacon@xxxxxxx are
queue-4.8/arm64-swp-emulation-bound-ll-sc-retries-before-rescheduling.patch
queue-4.8/arm64-kaslr-fix-breakage-with-config_modversions-y.patch
queue-4.8/arm64-cortex-a53-errata-workaround-check-for-kernel-addresses.patch
queue-4.8/arm64-kernel-init-mdcr_el2-even-in-the-absence-of-a-pmu.patch
queue-4.8/arm64-kvm-take-s1-walks-into-account-when-determining-s2-write-faults.patch
queue-4.8/arm64-percpu-rewrite-ll-sc-loops-in-assembly.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html