Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 02:05 -0700, Sumit Saxena wrote:
> From previous patch we have below changes in v2 -
> 1.  Updated change log.  Provided more detail in change log.
> 2.  Agreed to remove module parameter. If we remove module parameter,
> we 
>     can ask customer to disable WCE on drive to get similar impact.
> 3.  Always Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE  for JBOD (non Raid) Device to
> Firmware.
>  
> Current megaraid_sas driver returns SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE(related to
> Drive
> Cache)  command  back to SCSI layer without sending it down to
> firmware as
> firmware supposed to take care of flushing disk cache for all drives
> belongs to Virtual Disk at the time of system reboot/shutdown.
>  
> We evaluate and understood that for Raid Volume, why driver should
> not
> send SYNC_CACHE command to the Firmware.
> There may be a some reason in past, but now it looks to be not
> required and
> we have fixed this issue as part of this patch.
> 
> Commit- " 02b01e0 [SCSI] megaraid_sas: return sync cache call with
> success"
> added the code in driver to return SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE without sending
> it to 
> firmware back in 2007. Earlier MR was mainly for Virtual Disk,
> so same code continue for JBOD as well whenever JBOD support was
> added and it introduced bug that
> SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE is not passed to FW for JBOD (non Raid disk).
> 
> But our recent analysis indicates that, From Day-1 MR Firmware always
> expect Driver to forward SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid disk)
> to the
> Firmware.
> We have fixed this as part of this patch.
>  
>  - Additional background -
> There are some instance of MegaRaid FW (E.a Gen2 and Gen2.5 FW) set
> WCE bit
> for Virtual Disk but firmware does not reply correct status for
> SYNCH_CACHE.
> It is very difficult to find out which Device ID and firmware has
> capability
> to manage SYNC_CACHE, so we managed to figure out which are the new
> firmware
> (canHandleSyncCache is set in scratch pad register at 0xB4) and use
> that
> interface for correct behavior as explained above.
>  
> E.g Liberator/Thunderbolt MegaRaid FW returns SYNC_CACHE as
> Unsupported
> command (this is a firmware bug) and eventually command will be
> failed to SML.
> This will cause File system to go Read-only.
>  
>  - New behavior described -
>  
> IF application requests SYNCH_CACHE
>    IF 'JBOD'
>               Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the FW
>                FW sends SYNCH_CACHE to drive
>                FW obtains status from drive and returns same status
> back to driver
>    ELSEIF 'VirtualDisk'
>                IF any FW which supports new API bit called
> canHandleSyncCache
>                               Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the
> FW
>                               FW does not send SYNCH_CACHE to drives
>                               FW returns SUCCESS
>                ELSE
>                               Driver does not send SYNCH_CACHE
> command to the FW.
>                               Driver return SUCCESS for that command.
>                ENDIF
>     ENDIF
> ENDIF
> 
> CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Can you please split this into two, so we can backport the bug fix
without any of the feature addition junk?

> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h        |  3 +++
>  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c   | 10 ++--------
>  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> index ca86c88..43fd14f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> @@ -1429,6 +1429,8 @@ enum FW_BOOT_CONTEXT {
>  #define MR_MAX_REPLY_QUEUES_EXT_OFFSET_SHIFT    14
>  #define MR_MAX_MSIX_REG_ARRAY                   16
>  #define MR_RDPQ_MODE_OFFSET			0X00800000
> +#define MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET		0X01000000
> +
>  /*
>  * register set for both 1068 and 1078 controllers
>  * structure extended for 1078 registers
> @@ -2140,6 +2142,7 @@ struct megasas_instance {
>  	u8 is_imr;
>  	u8 is_rdpq;
>  	bool dev_handle;
> +	bool fw_sync_cache_support;
>  };
>  struct MR_LD_VF_MAP {
>  	u32 size;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> index 3236632..f7a2ab1 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> @@ -1700,16 +1700,10 @@ inline int megasas_cmd_type(struct scsi_cmnd
> *cmd)
>  		goto out_done;
>  	}
>  
> -	switch (scmd->cmnd[0]) {
> -	case SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE:
> -		/*
> -		 * FW takes care of flush cache on its own
> -		 * No need to send it down
> -		 */
> +	if (MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL(scmd) && (scmd->cmnd[0] ==
> SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE) &&
> +		(!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)) {
>  		scmd->result = DID_OK << 16;
>  		goto out_done;

This, minus the  "&& (!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)" is all we need
for the bug fix, correct?

James

> -	default:
> -		break;
>  	}
>  
>  	return instance->instancet->build_and_issue_cmd(instance,
> scmd);
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> index 2159f6a..2e61306 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> @@ -748,6 +748,11 @@ static int megasas_create_sg_sense_fusion(struct
> megasas_instance *instance)
>  		goto fail_fw_init;
>  	}
>  
> +	instance->fw_sync_cache_support = (scratch_pad_2 &
> +		MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET) ? 1 : 0;
> +	dev_info(&instance->pdev->dev, "FW supports sync cache\t:
> %s\n",
> +		 instance->fw_sync_cache_support ? "Yes" : "No");
> +
>  	IOCInitMessage =
>  	  dma_alloc_coherent(&instance->pdev->dev,
>  			     sizeof(struct MPI2_IOC_INIT_REQUEST),

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]