From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit 06dfe5cc0cc684e735cb0232fdb756d30780b05d upstream.
SA1111 PCMCIA was broken when PCMCIA switched to using dev_pm_ops for
the PCMCIA socket class. PCMCIA used to handle suspend/resume via the
socket hosting device, which happened at normal device suspend/resume
time.
However, the referenced commit changed this: much of the resume now
happens much earlier, in the noirq resume handler of dev_pm_ops.
However, on SA1111, the PCMCIA device is not accessible as the SA1111
has not been resumed at _noirq time. It's slightly worse than that,
because the SA1111 has already been put to sleep at _noirq time, so
suspend doesn't work properly.
Fix this by converting the core SA1111 code to use dev_pm_ops as well,
and performing its own suspend/resume at noirq time.
This fixes these errors in the kernel log:
pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: time out after reset
pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: time out after reset
and the resulting lack of PCMCIA cards after a S2RAM cycle.
Fixes: d7646f7632549 ("pcmcia: use dev_pm_ops for class pcmcia_socket_class")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/common/sa1111.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
index e57d7e5bf96a..932125a20877 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
@@ -872,9 +872,9 @@ struct sa1111_save_data {
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
-static int sa1111_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
+static int sa1111_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
- struct sa1111 *sachip = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct sa1111 *sachip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct sa1111_save_data *save;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int val;
@@ -937,9 +937,9 @@ static int sa1111_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
* restored by their respective drivers, and must be called
* via LDM after this function.
*/
-static int sa1111_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
+static int sa1111_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
- struct sa1111 *sachip = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct sa1111 *sachip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct sa1111_save_data *save;
unsigned long flags, id;
void __iomem *base;
@@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
id = sa1111_readl(sachip->base + SA1111_SKID);
if ((id & SKID_ID_MASK) != SKID_SA1111_ID) {
__sa1111_remove(sachip);
- platform_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
+ dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
kfree(save);
return 0;
}
@@ -1006,8 +1006,8 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
}
#else
-#define sa1111_suspend NULL
-#define sa1111_resume NULL
+#define sa1111_suspend_noirq NULL
+#define sa1111_resume_noirq NULL
#endif
static int sa1111_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -1041,6 +1041,11 @@ static int sa1111_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
+static struct dev_pm_ops sa1111_pm_ops = {
+ .suspend_noirq = sa1111_suspend_noirq,
+ .resume_noirq = sa1111_resume_noirq,
+};
+
/*
* Not sure if this should be on the system bus or not yet.
* We really want some way to register a system device at
@@ -1053,11 +1058,10 @@ static int sa1111_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static struct platform_driver sa1111_device_driver = {
.probe = sa1111_probe,
.remove = sa1111_remove,
- .suspend = sa1111_suspend,
- .resume = sa1111_resume,
.driver = {
.name = "sa1111",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .pm = &sa1111_pm_ops,
},
};
--
2.10.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html