Em Seg, 2016-10-10 às 16:34 -0400, Lyude Paul escreveu: > Was there a new workaround added recently? Or was this something I > just > missed when writing the original code for this It's listed on the public spec: https://01.org/sites/default/files/docum entation/intel-gfx-prm-osrc-skl-vol12-display.pdf Pages 210 - 211. > > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 17:30 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > > Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for the > > workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's just > > unconditionally apply the workaround for everybody and we hope we > > can > > close all those numerous bugzilla tickets. Also, I'm not sure how > > easy > > it will be to backport the final implementation to the stable > > Kernels, > > and this patch here is probably easier to backport. > > > > At the present moment I still don't have confirmation that this > > patch > > fixes any of the bugs listed below, but we should definitely try > > testing all of them again. > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94337 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94605 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94884 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95010 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96226 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96828 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97450 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97830 > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Lyude <cpaul@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 49 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > index 62d730d..159831d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > @@ -2879,6 +2879,21 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane > > *plane) > > } > > } > > > > +/* > > + * FIXME: We still don't have the proper code detect if we need to > > apply the WA, > > + * so assume we'll always need it in order to avoid underruns. > > + */ > > +static bool intel_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct intel_atomic_state > > *state) > > +{ > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state- > > > > > > base.dev); > > + > > + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) || > > + IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)) > > + return true; > > + > > + return false; > > +} > > + > > static bool > > intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > { > > @@ -2999,9 +3014,10 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct > > drm_atomic_state *state) > > struct drm_device *dev = state->dev; > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); > > struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = > > to_intel_atomic_state(state); > > - struct drm_crtc *crtc; > > + struct intel_crtc *crtc; > > + struct intel_plane *plane; > > enum pipe pipe; > > - int level, plane; > > + int level, id, latency; > > > > if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv)) > > return false; > > @@ -3019,27 +3035,36 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct > > drm_atomic_state *state) > > > > /* Since we're now guaranteed to only have one active > > CRTC... */ > > pipe = ffs(intel_state->active_crtcs) - 1; > > - crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]; > > + crtc = to_intel_crtc(dev_priv- > > >pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]); > > > > - if (crtc->state->mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) > > + if (crtc->base.state->mode.flags & > > DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) > > return false; > > > > - for_each_plane(dev_priv, pipe, plane) { > > + for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) { > > + id = skl_wm_plane_id(plane); > > + > > /* Skip this plane if it's not enabled */ > > - if (intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][plane][0] > > == > > 0) > > + if (intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][id][0] == > > 0) > > continue; > > > > /* Find the highest enabled wm level for this > > plane > > */ > > for (level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev); > > - intel_state- > > > > > > wm_results.plane[pipe][plane][level] == 0; --level) > > + intel_state- > > >wm_results.plane[pipe][id][level] > > == 0; --level) > > { } > > > > + latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level]; > > + > > + if (intel_needs_memory_bw_wa(intel_state) && > > + plane->base.state->fb->modifier[0] == > > + I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED) > > + latency += 15; > > + > > /* > > * If any of the planes on this pipe don't enable > > wm > > levels > > * that incur memory latencies higher then 30µs we > > can't enable > > * the SAGV > > */ > > - if (dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level] < > > SKL_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME) > > + if (latency < SKL_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME) > > return false; > > } > > > > @@ -3549,12 +3574,18 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const > > struct > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > uint32_t width = 0, height = 0; > > uint32_t plane_pixel_rate; > > uint32_t y_tile_minimum, y_min_scanlines; > > + struct intel_atomic_state *state = > > + to_intel_atomic_state(cstate->base.state); > > + bool apply_memory_bw_wa = intel_needs_memory_bw_wa(state); > > > > if (latency == 0 || !cstate->base.active || !intel_pstate- > > > > > > base.visible) { > > *enabled = false; > > return 0; > > } > > > > + if (apply_memory_bw_wa && fb->modifier[0] == > > I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED) > > + latency += 15; > > + > > width = drm_rect_width(&intel_pstate->base.src) >> 16; > > height = drm_rect_height(&intel_pstate->base.src) >> 16; > > > > @@ -3607,6 +3638,8 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > plane_blocks_per_line); > > > > y_tile_minimum = plane_blocks_per_line * y_min_scanlines; > > + if (apply_memory_bw_wa) > > + y_tile_minimum *= 2; > > > > if (fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED || > > fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f