On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 09:47 +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 07:35:01AM +0000, Coelho, Luciano wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, this is probably a very rare case.
>
> Yes it is, this is the first time it has come up in over a decade of
> stable kernels that I can tell :)
Heheh, I had never seen something like this either and Johannes said
the same thing. :P
> > I was just nitpicking and thinking whether we could have prevented the
> > (small) overhead of getting the patch in the stable queue, getting a
> > comment and removing it from the queue, when we already knew from the
> > beginning that it was irrelevant for some kernels.
>
> A simple email like happened should be fine, it's easy to drop a patch
> like I did. No need to micromanage the process for something that is so
> rare...
Okay, sorry for the noise. :)
--
Cheers,
Luca.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f