On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 01:22:06AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > kernelci.org bot <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > stable-rc boot: 105 boots: 1 failed, 100 passed with 4 offline (v4.7.5-70-g64e4c0f6d4b1) > > > > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.7.5-70-g64e4c0f6d4b1/ > > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.7.5-70-g64e4c0f6d4b1/ > > > > Tree: stable-rc > > Branch: local/linux-4.7.y > > Git Describe: v4.7.5-70-g64e4c0f6d4b1 > > Git Commit: 64e4c0f6d4b12abd1966ac9ad2082a0815a3d0eb > > Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > Tested: 32 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 20 builds out of 205 > > > > Boot Failure Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.7.5-70-g64e4c0f6d4b1&fail > > > > arm: > > > > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y: > > at91-sama5d3_xplained: 1 failed lab > > This looks like a legit new failure, and the same thing is happening on > stable-rc/linux-4.4.y. > > I've asked the lab with this board to have a closer look, Thanks, I don't see anything obvious in the patch series that would have affected this board, but given the PROVE_LOCKING option, maybe it was a more generic change that is causing the issue. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html