4.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx> commit 0a11b9aae49adf1f952427ef1a1d9e793dd6ffb6 upstream. new_insert_key only makes any sense when it's associated with a new_insert_ptr, which is initialized to NULL and changed to a buffer_head when we also initialize new_insert_key. We can key off of that to avoid the uninitialized warning. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5eca5ffb-2155-8df2-b4a2-f162f105efed@xxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c +++ b/fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c @@ -1153,8 +1153,9 @@ int balance_internal(struct tree_balance insert_ptr); } - memcpy(new_insert_key_addr, &new_insert_key, KEY_SIZE); insert_ptr[0] = new_insert_ptr; + if (new_insert_ptr) + memcpy(new_insert_key_addr, &new_insert_key, KEY_SIZE); return order; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html