4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit 6e8d666e925333c55378e8d5540a8a9ee0eea9c5 upstream. Several build configurations had already disabled this warning because it generates a lot of false positives. But some had not, and it was still enabled for "allmodconfig" builds, for example. Looking at the warnings produced, every single one I looked at was a false positive, and the warnings are frequent enough (and big enough) that they can easily hide real problems that you don't notice in the noise generated by -Wmaybe-uninitialized. The warning is good in theory, but this is a classic case of a warning that causes more problems than the warning can solve. If gcc gets better at avoiding false positives, we may be able to re-enable this warning. But as is, we're better off without it, and I want to be able to see the *real* warnings. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Makefile | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ AFLAGS_MODULE = LDFLAGS_MODULE = CFLAGS_KERNEL = AFLAGS_KERNEL = -CFLAGS_GCOV = -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im -Wno-maybe-uninitialized +CFLAGS_GCOV = -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im # Use USERINCLUDE when you must reference the UAPI directories only. @@ -616,12 +616,13 @@ ARCH_CFLAGS := include arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks,) +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,) ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Os $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,) +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Os else ifdef CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,) +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2 else KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2 endif -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html