The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 3.10-stable tree.
I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.
I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to
<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and let me know why this patch should be
applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
seen again.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 30a9f0b251285ba29f09a7134eee07a4c3aca639 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:32:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] parisc: more capabilities info in /proc/cpuinfo
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.10
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/processor.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/processor.c
index c8fb61e..8a96c8a 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/processor.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/processor.c
@@ -371,10 +371,23 @@ show_cpuinfo (struct seq_file *m, void *v)
seq_printf(m, "capabilities\t:");
if (boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities & PDC_MODEL_OS32)
- seq_printf(m, " os32");
+ seq_puts(m, " os32");
if (boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities & PDC_MODEL_OS64)
- seq_printf(m, " os64");
- seq_printf(m, "\n");
+ seq_puts(m, " os64");
+ if (boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities & PDC_MODEL_IOPDIR_FDC)
+ seq_puts(m, " iopdir_fdc");
+ switch (boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities & PDC_MODEL_NVA_MASK) {
+ case PDC_MODEL_NVA_SUPPORTED:
+ seq_puts(m, " nva_supported");
+ break;
+ case PDC_MODEL_NVA_SLOW:
+ seq_puts(m, " nva_slow");
+ break;
+ case PDC_MODEL_NVA_UNSUPPORTED:
+ seq_puts(m, " needs_equivalent_aliasing");
+ break;
+ }
+ seq_printf(m, " (0x%02lx)\n", boot_cpu_data.pdc.capabilities);
seq_printf(m, "model\t\t: %s\n"
"model name\t: %s\n",
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html