On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 08:36:52AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> @@ -576,7 +576,8 @@ static int tpm2_load(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, "loading blob");
> + rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, TPM_TRANSMIT_UNLOCKED,
> + "loading blob");
I still don't like this, required mutex's should not be split outside the
function that needs them without more a more obvious indication:
> + mutex_lock(&chip->tpm_mutex);
> rc = tpm2_load(chip, payload, options, &blob_handle);
> if (rc)
> - return rc;
I recommend you stick with the idiom and do this:
mutex_lock(&chip->tpm_mutex);
rc = tpm2_load(chip, payload, options, &blob_handle, TPM_TRANSMIT_UNLOCKED);
Which makes it easy to see we are doing it right everywhere.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html