Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: correctly restore fences with objects attached

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:51:28 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +		if (reg->obj) {
> +			i915_gem_object_update_fence(reg->obj, reg,
> +						     reg->obj->tiling_mode);
> +		} else {
> +			i915_gem_write_fence(dev, i, NULL);
> +		}

Why do we look at reg->obj here?  Can it be NULL?  Or would
reg->obj->tiling_mode != I915_TILING_NONE do the same thing?

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]