On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:43:09PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 12:11 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > People mark stable patches that way already today with a:
> > Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # delay for 3.12-rc4
> > or some such wording. I take those and don't apply them until the noted
> > release happens, so you can do this if needed.
>
> I guess the thing is, are stable patches prone to regressions. Do we
> just do that for patches that we think are too complex and may cause
> some harm. Of course, there's the question about having a clue about
> what patches might cause harm or not.
We'd probably better switch the tag to be "# now" to imply that we don't
want to delay them, and that by default those merged prior to rc4 are all
postponed. I suspect that the switching could be mostly automated this way,
avoiding to add burden to Greg :
- if commit ID >= -rc4
move to immediate queue, it's a "critical" fix as per Linus' rules
- if Cc: stable line has "now" at the end, move to immediate queue as
the maintainer takes this reponsibility ;
- otherwise move to the next .2 queue.
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html