Yoshihiro-san,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> This patch set is based on the latest Felipe's usb.git / testing/next branch.
> (commit id = 15e4292a2d21e9997fdb2b8c014cc461b3f268f0)
>
> This patch set also needs an additional patch (like the end of this email)
> to fix the renesas_usbhs driver for R-Car Gen3.
> (I will submit this patch after v4.8-rc1 was released.)
>
> I'm not sure this is a correct way or not. So, I added "RFC" in this patch set.
> About the detail of this patch set, please refer to the commit log of
> first patch ("usb: gadget: add a new quirk to avoid skb_reserve in u_ether.c").
>
> Yoshihiro Shimoda (4):
> usb: gadget: add a new quirk to avoid skb_reserve in u_ether.c
> usb: gadget: u_ether: add a flag to avoid skb_reserve() calling
> usb: gadget: f_ncm: add support for no_skb_reserve
> usb: renesas_usbhs: set quirk_avoids_skb_reserve if USB-DMAC is used
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c | 2 ++
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.h | 1 +
> drivers/usb/renesas_usbhs/mod_gadget.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/usb/gadget.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
It has been over a month since you sent this series and nobody said
anything. Can you resend without RFC so I can apply?
Thank you
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature