4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Wei Fang <fangwei1@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 47be61845c775643f1aa4d2a54343549f943c94c upstream.
We triggered soft-lockup under stress test which
open/access/write/close one file concurrently on more than
five different CPUs:
WARN: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [who:30631]
...
[<ffffffc0003986f8>] dput+0x100/0x298
[<ffffffc00038c2dc>] terminate_walk+0x4c/0x60
[<ffffffc00038f56c>] path_lookupat+0x5cc/0x7a8
[<ffffffc00038f780>] filename_lookup+0x38/0xf0
[<ffffffc000391180>] user_path_at_empty+0x78/0xd0
[<ffffffc0003911f4>] user_path_at+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffffc00037d4fc>] SyS_faccessat+0xb4/0x230
->d_lock trylock may failed many times because of concurrently
operations, and dput() may execute a long time.
Fix this by replacing cpu_relax() with cond_resched().
dput() used to be sleepable, so make it sleepable again
should be safe.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <fangwei1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/dcache.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -578,7 +578,6 @@ static struct dentry *dentry_kill(struct
failed:
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
- cpu_relax();
return dentry; /* try again with same dentry */
}
@@ -752,6 +751,8 @@ void dput(struct dentry *dentry)
return;
repeat:
+ might_sleep();
+
rcu_read_lock();
if (likely(fast_dput(dentry))) {
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -783,8 +784,10 @@ repeat:
kill_it:
dentry = dentry_kill(dentry);
- if (dentry)
+ if (dentry) {
+ cond_resched();
goto repeat;
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dput);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html