3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx> commit f70749ca42943faa4d4dcce46dfdcaadb1d0c4b6 upstream. An extent with lblock = 4294967295 and len = 1 will pass the ext4_valid_extent() test: ext4_lblk_t last = lblock + len - 1; if (len == 0 || lblock > last) return 0; since last = 4294967295 + 1 - 1 = 4294967295. This would later trigger the BUG_ON(es->es_lblk + es->es_len < es->es_lblk) in ext4_es_end(). We can simplify it by removing the - 1 altogether and changing the test to use lblock + len <= lblock, since now if len = 0, then lblock + 0 == lblock and it fails, and if len > 0 then lblock + len > lblock in order to pass (i.e. it doesn't overflow). Fixes: 5946d0893 ("ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()") Fixes: 2f974865f ("ext4: check for zero length extent explicitly") Cc: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Phil Turnbull <phil.turnbull@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -359,9 +359,13 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent(struct inod ext4_fsblk_t block = ext4_ext_pblock(ext); int len = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext); ext4_lblk_t lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block); - ext4_lblk_t last = lblock + len - 1; - if (len == 0 || lblock > last) + /* + * We allow neither: + * - zero length + * - overflow/wrap-around + */ + if (lblock + len <= lblock) return 0; return ext4_data_block_valid(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), block, len); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html