On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Greg KH wrote: > > Anything that's being reviewed on the stable list is public. I know > > this is an old argument, but if you point out a fix you *know* has a > > security impact then you'll help general distribution maintainers and > > users a lot more than you help the black-hats who are quite capable of > > recognising such a fix (if they haven't already spotted and exploited > > the bug). > > I'm sorry, but you know I will not do that, so asking about it isn't > going to change this behavior. I just followed up in the other thread, where Ted was explaining why the huge /dev/random rework was a -stable material. Why specifically would it be wrong to be open about this being security related, and providing the necessary data (i.e. at least reference to http://factorable.net/) publically? I fail to see what the point behind hiding this would be. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html