On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:04:28PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 13:19 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > That seems to be a bit drastic. It is quite useful to have the tag, > > but maybe it should only be added by the maintainer and not in the initial > > patch submission. This would ensure that the maintainer(s) made the decision. > > If the original patch submitter thinks that the patch is stable material, > > that information could be added in the comments section. > > In the case where a maintainer applies a patch with 'git am', surely > they can *see* that it's cc:stable? > If that maintainer is careful, yes. But that isn't the point or idea. The difference is that the maintainer would have to make an active decision to add the cc:stable tag vs. just going along with it. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html