On 07/23/2016 03:39 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 11:52:23AM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
seq_read() can call ->start() twice on the same iterator more than once
(e.g. once through traverse() and once in seq_read() itself).
But when traverse() returns the error, it goes to Done label, skipping
the call to ->start() from seq_read(), or am I missing something?
I think you're right.
Though yes, if sctp_ht_iter memory is actually re-used without
initializting between seq_read()s, it triggers the issue you described.
The sctp_ht_iter is allocated in
sctp_assocs_seq_open()/sctp_remaddr_seq_open(), so I assume it's
allocated on open().
How did you trigger this, reading after an error on the file descriptor?
I was using trinity, so I'm not quite sure a priori, but the problem was
100% reproducible before I applied the patch and seeing that it gets
allocated on open() and is never cleared anywhere else, your suggestion
sounds like the most plausible explanation :-)
How about rewording the first paragraph as:
"""
sctp_transport_seq_start() does not currently clear iter->start_fail on
success, but relies on it being zero when it is allocated (by
seq_open_net()).
This can be a problem in the following sequence:
open() -- allocates iter (and implicitly sets iter->start_fail = 0)
read()
iter->start() -- fails and sets iter->start_fail = 1
iter->stop() -- doesn't call sctp_transport_walk_stop() (correct)
read() again
iter->start() -- succeeds, but doesn't change iter->start_fail
iter->stop() -- doesn't call sctp_transport_walk_stop() (wrong)
"""
Let me know how that sounds.
Thanks for looking so closely at it!
Vegard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html