On 22-07-16, 23:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > cpufreq.c
> >
> > if (policy->governor->max_transition_latency &&
> > policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency >
> > policy->governor->max_transition_latency) {
> >
> > - And this check will always fail, unless max_transition_latency is zero.
>
> Why would it fail? If governor->max_transition_latency is non-zero, but less
> than UNIT_MAX, the condition checked will be true to my eyes.
Bad wording. Sorry.
I meant, this 'if' check will always succeed (as you also noted), and
so we will always get the error message reported in this patch.
cpufreq: ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency of HW,
fallback to performance governor
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html