This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq avg tracking underflow to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: sched-fair-fix-cfs_rq-avg-tracking-underflow.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From 8974189222159154c55f24ddad33e3613960521a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:50:40 +0200 Subject: sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq avg tracking underflow From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit 8974189222159154c55f24ddad33e3613960521a upstream. As per commit: b7fa30c9cc48 ("sched/fair: Fix post_init_entity_util_avg() serialization") > the code generated from update_cfs_rq_load_avg(): > > if (atomic_long_read(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg)) { > s64 r = atomic_long_xchg(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg, 0); > sa->load_avg = max_t(long, sa->load_avg - r, 0); > sa->load_sum = max_t(s64, sa->load_sum - r * LOAD_AVG_MAX, 0); > removed_load = 1; > } > > turns into: > > ffffffff81087064: 49 8b 85 98 00 00 00 mov 0x98(%r13),%rax > ffffffff8108706b: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax > ffffffff8108706e: 74 40 je ffffffff810870b0 <update_blocked_averages+0xc0> > ffffffff81087070: 4c 89 f8 mov %r15,%rax > ffffffff81087073: 49 87 85 98 00 00 00 xchg %rax,0x98(%r13) > ffffffff8108707a: 49 29 45 70 sub %rax,0x70(%r13) > ffffffff8108707e: 4c 89 f9 mov %r15,%rcx > ffffffff81087081: bb 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%ebx > ffffffff81087086: 49 83 7d 70 00 cmpq $0x0,0x70(%r13) > ffffffff8108708b: 49 0f 49 4d 70 cmovns 0x70(%r13),%rcx > > Which you'll note ends up with sa->load_avg -= r in memory at > ffffffff8108707a. So I _should_ have looked at other unserialized users of ->load_avg, but alas. Luckily nikbor reported a similar /0 from task_h_load() which instantly triggered recollection of this here problem. Aside from the intermediate value hitting memory and causing problems, there's another problem: the underflow detection relies on the signed bit. This reduces the effective width of the variables, IOW its effectively the same as having these variables be of signed type. This patch changes to a different means of unsigned underflow detection to not rely on the signed bit. This allows the variables to use the 'full' unsigned range. And it does so with explicit LOAD - STORE to ensure any intermediate value will never be visible in memory, allowing these unserialized loads. Note: GCC generates crap code for this, might warrant a look later. Note2: I say 'full' above, if we end up at U*_MAX we'll still explode; maybe we should do clamping on add too. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: kernel@xxxxxxxx Cc: morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx Cc: pjt@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: steve.muckle@xxxxxxxxxx Fixes: 9d89c257dfb9 ("sched/fair: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160617091948.GJ30927@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -2821,6 +2821,23 @@ static inline void update_tg_load_avg(st static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_task(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); +/* + * Unsigned subtract and clamp on underflow. + * + * Explicitly do a load-store to ensure the intermediate value never hits + * memory. This allows lockless observations without ever seeing the negative + * values. + */ +#define sub_positive(_ptr, _val) do { \ + typeof(_ptr) ptr = (_ptr); \ + typeof(*ptr) val = (_val); \ + typeof(*ptr) res, var = READ_ONCE(*ptr); \ + res = var - val; \ + if (res > var) \ + res = 0; \ + WRITE_ONCE(*ptr, res); \ +} while (0) + /* Group cfs_rq's load_avg is used for task_h_load and update_cfs_share */ static inline int update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { @@ -2829,15 +2846,15 @@ static inline int update_cfs_rq_load_avg if (atomic_long_read(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg)) { s64 r = atomic_long_xchg(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg, 0); - sa->load_avg = max_t(long, sa->load_avg - r, 0); - sa->load_sum = max_t(s64, sa->load_sum - r * LOAD_AVG_MAX, 0); + sub_positive(&sa->load_avg, r); + sub_positive(&sa->load_sum, r * LOAD_AVG_MAX); removed = 1; } if (atomic_long_read(&cfs_rq->removed_util_avg)) { long r = atomic_long_xchg(&cfs_rq->removed_util_avg, 0); - sa->util_avg = max_t(long, sa->util_avg - r, 0); - sa->util_sum = max_t(s32, sa->util_sum - r * LOAD_AVG_MAX, 0); + sub_positive(&sa->util_avg, r); + sub_positive(&sa->util_sum, r * LOAD_AVG_MAX); } decayed = __update_load_avg(now, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)), sa, @@ -2927,10 +2944,10 @@ static void detach_entity_load_avg(struc &se->avg, se->on_rq * scale_load_down(se->load.weight), cfs_rq->curr == se, NULL); - cfs_rq->avg.load_avg = max_t(long, cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - se->avg.load_avg, 0); - cfs_rq->avg.load_sum = max_t(s64, cfs_rq->avg.load_sum - se->avg.load_sum, 0); - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg = max_t(long, cfs_rq->avg.util_avg - se->avg.util_avg, 0); - cfs_rq->avg.util_sum = max_t(s32, cfs_rq->avg.util_sum - se->avg.util_sum, 0); + sub_positive(&cfs_rq->avg.load_avg, se->avg.load_avg); + sub_positive(&cfs_rq->avg.load_sum, se->avg.load_sum); + sub_positive(&cfs_rq->avg.util_avg, se->avg.util_avg); + sub_positive(&cfs_rq->avg.util_sum, se->avg.util_sum); } /* Add the load generated by se into cfs_rq's load average */ Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are queue-4.6/futex-calculate-the-futex-key-based-on-a-tail-page-for-file-based-futexes.patch queue-4.6/kprobes-x86-clear-tf-bit-in-fault-on-single-stepping.patch queue-4.6/sched-fair-fix-cfs_rq-avg-tracking-underflow.patch queue-4.6/x86-amd_nb-fix-boot-crash-on-non-amd-systems.patch queue-4.6/perf-x86-fix-32-bit-perf-user-callgraph-collection.patch queue-4.6/locking-qspinlock-fix-spin_unlock_wait-some-more.patch queue-4.6/locking-static_key-fix-concurrent-static_key_slow_inc.patch queue-4.6/perf-x86-intel-rapl-fix-pmus-free-during-cleanup.patch queue-4.6/locking-ww_mutex-report-recursive-ww_mutex-locking-early.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html