3.19.8-ckt23 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 51b07f30a71c27405259a0248206ed4e22adbee2 upstream.
Some careless idiot(*) wrote crap code in commit 1a3e8f3 ("xfs:
convert inode cache lookups to use RCU locking") back in late 2010,
and so xfs_iflush_cluster checks the wrong inode for whether it is
still valid under RCU protection. Fix it to lock and check the
correct inode.
(*) Careless-idiot: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Discovered-by: Brain Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index 484c569..f037fe7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -2956,13 +2956,13 @@ xfs_iflush_cluster(
* We need to check under the i_flags_lock for a valid inode
* here. Skip it if it is not valid or the wrong inode.
*/
- spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
- if (!ip->i_ino ||
+ spin_lock(&iq->i_flags_lock);
+ if (!iq->i_ino ||
(XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, iq->i_ino) & mask) != first_index) {
- spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&iq->i_flags_lock);
continue;
}
- spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&iq->i_flags_lock);
/*
* Do an un-protected check to see if the inode is dirty and
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html