Re: [PATCH] xen-tpmfront: correct return value check on xenbus_scanf()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> On 07.07.16 at 12:38, <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:35:54PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:04:00AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > Only a positive return value indicates success.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Applied. Should this be CC'd to stable or not?

Actually the Xen code maintainers dislike this kind of change
(expressed in reply to a change elsewhere in the tree), so
maybe you want to sync with them whether to pull it back out.
In any event I don't think it needs Cc-ing to stable@.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]