The patch titled
Subject: fs/nilfs2: fix potential underflow in call to crc32_le
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
fs-nilfs2-fix-potential-underflow-in-call-to-crc32_le.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fs/nilfs2: fix potential underflow in call to crc32_le
The value `bytes' comes from the filesystem which is about to be mounted.
We cannot trust that the value is always in the range we expect it to be.
Check its value before using it to calculate the length for the crc32_le
call. It value must be larger (or equal) sumoff + 4.
This fixes a kernel bug when accidentially mounting an image file which
had the nilfs2 magic value 0x3434 at the right offset 0x406 by chance.
The bytes 0x01 0x00 were stored at 0x408 and were interpreted as a s_bytes
value of 1. This caused an underflow when substracting sumoff + 4 (20) in
the call to crc32_le.
[201699.185465] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
ffff88021e600000
[201699.186111] IP: [<ffffffff814083c6>] crc32_le+0x36/0x100
...
[201699.206202] Call Trace:
[201699.206982] [<ffffffffc0907492>] nilfs_valid_sb.part.5+0x52/0x60
[nilfs2]
[201699.207773] [<ffffffffc09075e2>] nilfs_load_super_block+0x142/0x300
[nilfs2]
[201699.208564] [<ffffffff812479fd>] ? set_blocksize+0x9d/0xd0
[201699.209355] [<ffffffffc0908020>] init_nilfs+0x60/0x390 [nilfs2]
[201699.210160] [<ffffffffc08fc962>] nilfs_mount+0x302/0x520 [nilfs2]
[201699.210930] [<ffffffff811b16a5>] ? pcpu_alloc+0x385/0x670
[201699.211685] [<ffffffff81210c58>] mount_fs+0x38/0x160
[201699.212413] [<ffffffff811b19c5>] ? __alloc_percpu+0x15/0x20
[201699.213151] [<ffffffff8122cbe7>] vfs_kern_mount+0x67/0x110
[201699.213898] [<ffffffff8122f3b9>] do_mount+0x269/0xe00
[201699.214671] [<ffffffff8122d5a4>] ? mntput+0x24/0x40
[201699.215432] [<ffffffff811ef064>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x1b4/0x250
[201699.216207] [<ffffffff8120eaf0>] ? __fput+0x190/0x220
[201699.216987] [<ffffffff811ac0e2>] ? memdup_user+0x42/0x70
[201699.217777] [<ffffffff8123027f>] SyS_mount+0x9f/0x100
[201699.218595] [<ffffffff81825bf2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x71
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466778587-5184-2-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c~fs-nilfs2-fix-potential-underflow-in-call-to-crc32_le fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
--- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c~fs-nilfs2-fix-potential-underflow-in-call-to-crc32_le
+++ a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static int nilfs_valid_sb(struct nilfs_s
if (!sbp || le16_to_cpu(sbp->s_magic) != NILFS_SUPER_MAGIC)
return 0;
bytes = le16_to_cpu(sbp->s_bytes);
- if (bytes > BLOCK_SIZE)
+ if (bytes < sumoff + 4 || bytes > BLOCK_SIZE)
return 0;
crc = crc32_le(le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_crc_seed), (unsigned char *)sbp,
sumoff);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from torsten.hilbrich@xxxxxxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html