On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:22:00AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi greg,
>
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 06:41:23PM +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > The patch below does not apply to the 4.6-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
>
> Thanks for considering the patch for stable. It seems though that my
> notes concerning stable have been lost in transmission.
>
> The first observation is that the regression was introduced in 4.4, so
> no earlier stable trees are affected.
>
> Then I had to rebase my patch, because it touches the same lines as
> 615d23f80efc ("gpio: zynq: Fix the error path"). My initial patch
> posting[1] did not consider that patch, so there you go with a rebased
> patch that applies to earlier kernel versions. I still use that patch
> successfully for bisecting.
>
> I do note however, that the mentioned "Fix the error path" commit also
> looks like it should be included into a stable tree, because it fixes an
> unbalanced pm_runtime_enable. Thus I recommend applying it to stable as
> well. Then the patch that went into 4.7-rc3 just applies.
Thanks, I think I have it worked out now.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html