On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:57:56AM +0000, Yang, Wenyou wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: 2016年6月5日 5:58 > > To: romain.izard.pro@xxxxxxxxx; Yang, Wenyou <Wenyou.Yang@xxxxxxxxx>; > > boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx; > > robh@xxxxxxxxxx; Yang, Wenyou <Wenyou.Yang@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mtd: atmel_nand: Support variable RB_EDGE > > interrupts" failed to apply to 4.6-stable tree > > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 4.6-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then > > please email the backport, including the original git commit id to > > <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > This patch is unneeded. > It has been reverted by the commit 53b74ed2d0b4 ("Revert "mtd: atmel_nand: Support variable RB_EDGE interrupts""). > > Please don't apply this one. > > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > > > > From 5ddc7bd43ccc77173f149483fa27a0b8f85e09e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:56:23 +0100 > > Subject: [PATCH] mtd: atmel_nand: Support variable RB_EDGE interrupts Why is commit 5ddc7bd43ccc77173f149483fa27a0b8f85e09e5 even showing up here? If this was automated, then that seems like a bug in the -stable scripts. Commit 5ddc7bd43ccc77173f149483fa27a0b8f85e09e5 was already in v4.6, and it had no for-stable tags. The above patch mentioned by Wenyou *was* marked for -stable (though I'm no longer confident it is actually -stable material; but that's a different story): commit 53b74ed2d0b4 ("Revert "mtd: atmel_nand: Support variable RB_EDGE interrupts"") Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html