3.6.11.6 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 230b3034793247f61e6a0b08c44cf415f6d92981 ] When replaying interrupts (as a result of the interrupt occurring while soft-disabled), in the case of the decrementer, we are exclusively testing for a pending timer target. However we also use decrementer interrupts to trigger the new "irq_work", which in this case would be missed. This change the logic to force a replay in both cases of a timer boundary reached and a decrementer interrupt having actually occurred while disabled. The former test is still useful to catch cases where a CPU having been hard-disabled for a long time completely misses the interrupt due to a decrementer rollover. CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [v3.4+] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c index 1f017bb..86cb68e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ notrace unsigned int __check_irq_replay(void) * in case we also had a rollover while hard disabled */ local_paca->irq_happened &= ~PACA_IRQ_DEC; - if (decrementer_check_overflow()) + if ((happened & PACA_IRQ_DEC) || decrementer_check_overflow()) return 0x900; /* Finally check if an external interrupt happened */ -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html