On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:59:45AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Which use a sequence of: in_nmi(), in_irq(), in_softirq() to pick 1 out
> of 4 possible contexts.
So should we make it cleaner and explicit and define a 5th context of
priorities higher than NMI?
There's some room between those two:
* NMI_MASK: 0x00100000
* PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED: 0x80000000
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html