On 05/18/2016 04:36 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 03:47 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>
>>> Is there a special reason you didn't add the CVE number to the change-log?
>
>> I didn't write the commit change log. I used the commit change log from
>> the original patch that didn't fail to apply.
>
> I mean on the original patch when you added your maintainer S.O.B
Because of an issue of confusion. Red Hat had an internal CVE assigned,
but I didn't know I could put that on here. There wasn't an assigned
MITRE CVE yet. Then people noticed the patch, someone requested a CVE
on the mitre list, and another one got assigned. Red Hat has since
dropped their internal CVE and adopted the mitre CVE. That probably
would have been avoided had I known to put Red Hat's internal CVE on there.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature