Re: [PATCH] asix: Fix offset calculation in asix_rx_fixup() causing slow transmissions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi John,

Thanks for your patch. I think the patch has already been applied.

The git commit subject of
"asix: Fix offset calculation in asix_rx_fixup() causing slow transmissions"

I think is a bit misleading as the bug relates to reception and not transmission.

I guess that your intent was to say that "the through-put of communications was low" due to the bug.

Personally, I would of used a git subject like
"asix: Fix asix_rx_fixup_interval() offset calculation for spanned frames"

But anyway, I have no real issue with the patch.

On 17/05/16 04:36, John Stultz wrote:
In testing with HiKey, we found that since
commit 3f30b158eba5 ("asix: On RX avoid creating bad Ethernet
frames"),
we're seeing lots of noise during network transfers:

[  239.027993] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Data Header synchronisation was lost, remaining 988
[  239.037310] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0x54ebb5ec, offset 4
[  239.045519] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0xcdffe7a2, offset 4
[  239.275044] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Data Header synchronisation was lost, remaining 988
[  239.284355] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0x1d36f59d, offset 4
[  239.292541] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0xaef3c1e9, offset 4
[  239.518996] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Data Header synchronisation was lost, remaining 988
[  239.528300] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0x2881912, offset 4
[  239.536413] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0x5638f7e2, offset 4

And network throughput ends up being pretty bursty and slow with
a overall throughput of at best ~30kB/s (where as previously we
got 1.1MB/s with the slower USB1.1 "full speed" host).

We found the issue also was reproducible on a x86_64 system,
using a "high-speed" USB2.0 port but the throughput did not
measurably drop (possibly due to the scp transfer being cpu
bound on my slow test hardware).

After lots of debugging, I found the check added in the
problematic commit seems to be calculating the offset
incorrectly.

In the normal case, in the main loop of the function, we do:
(where offset is zero, or set to "offset += (copy_length + 1) &
0xfffe" in the previous loop)
     rx->header = get_unaligned_le32(skb->data +
                                     offset);
     offset += sizeof(u32);

But the problematic patch calculates:
     offset = ((rx->remaining + 1) & 0xfffe) + sizeof(u32);
     rx->header = get_unaligned_le32(skb->data + offset);

Adding some debug logic to check those offset calculation used
to find rx->header, the one in problematic code is always too
large by sizeof(u32).

Thus, this patch removes the incorrect " + sizeof(u32)" addition
in the problematic calculation, and resolves the issue.

Cc: Dean Jenkins <Dean_Jenkins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "David B. Robins" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Craske <Mark_Craske@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Emil Goode <emilgoode@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: YongQin Liu <yongqin.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #4.4+
Reported-by: Yongqin Liu <yongqin.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c b/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
index 0c5c22b..7de5ab5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int asix_rx_fixup_internal(struct usbnet *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
  	 * buffer.
  	 */
  	if (rx->remaining && (rx->remaining + sizeof(u32) <= skb->len)) {
-		offset = ((rx->remaining + 1) & 0xfffe) + sizeof(u32);
+		offset = ((rx->remaining + 1) & 0xfffe);
I have verified that this fixes my ARM board. Thanks for finding the mistake. Note that the outer set of brackets could of been removed as they are redundant.

  		rx->header = get_unaligned_le32(skb->data + offset);
  		offset = 0;
Thanks,

Best regards,
Dean

--
Dean Jenkins
Embedded Software Engineer
Linux Transportation Solutions
Mentor Embedded Software Division
Mentor Graphics (UK) Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]