4.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 6aff67c85c9e5a4bc99e5211c1bac547936626ca ]
The commit 35578d798400 ("bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that get the selected hardware PMU conuter")
introduced clever way to check bpf_helper<->map_type compatibility.
Later on commit a43eec304259 ("bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper") adjusted
the logic and inadvertently broke it.
Get rid of the clever bool compare and go back to two-way check
from map and from helper perspective.
Fixes: a43eec304259 ("bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -239,15 +239,6 @@ static const char * const reg_type_str[]
[CONST_IMM] = "imm",
};
-static const struct {
- int map_type;
- int func_id;
-} func_limit[] = {
- {BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_tail_call},
- {BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read},
- {BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output},
-};
-
static void print_verifier_state(struct verifier_env *env)
{
enum bpf_reg_type t;
@@ -898,24 +889,44 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifie
static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id)
{
- bool bool_map, bool_func;
- int i;
-
if (!map)
return 0;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(func_limit); i++) {
- bool_map = (map->map_type == func_limit[i].map_type);
- bool_func = (func_id == func_limit[i].func_id);
- /* only when map & func pair match it can continue.
- * don't allow any other map type to be passed into
- * the special func;
- */
- if (bool_func && bool_map != bool_func)
- return -EINVAL;
+ /* We need a two way check, first is from map perspective ... */
+ switch (map->map_type) {
+ case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY:
+ if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_tail_call)
+ goto error;
+ break;
+ case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY:
+ if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read &&
+ func_id != BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output)
+ goto error;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* ... and second from the function itself. */
+ switch (func_id) {
+ case BPF_FUNC_tail_call:
+ if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY)
+ goto error;
+ break;
+ case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read:
+ case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output:
+ if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY)
+ goto error;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
}
return 0;
+error:
+ verbose("cannot pass map_type %d into func %d\n",
+ map->map_type, func_id);
+ return -EINVAL;
}
static int check_call(struct verifier_env *env, int func_id)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html