4.2.8-ckt10 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ---8<------------------------------------------------------------ From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> commit dab9a2663f4e688106c041f7cd2797a721382f0a upstream. During system resume we depended on pci_enable_device() also putting the device into PCI D0 state. This won't work if the PCI device was already enabled but still in D3 state. This is because pci_enable_device() is refcounted and will not change the HW state if called with a non-zero refcount. Leaving the device in D3 will make all subsequent device accesses fail. This didn't cause a problem most of the time, since we resumed with an enable refcount of 0. But it fails at least after module reload because after that we also happen to leak a PCI device enable reference: During probing we call drm_get_pci_dev() which will enable the PCI device, but during device removal drm_put_dev() won't disable it. This is a bug of its own in DRM core, but without much harm as it only leaves the PCI device enabled. Fixing it is also a bit more involved, due to DRM mid-layering and because it affects non-i915 drivers too. The fix in this patch is valid regardless of the problem in DRM core. v2: - Add a code comment about the relation of this fix to the freeze/thaw vs. the suspend/resume phases. (Ville) - Add a code comment about the inconsistent ordering of set power state and device enable calls. (Chris) CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460979954-14503-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx (cherry picked from commit 44410cd0bfb26bde9288da34c190cc9267d42a20) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> [ kamal: backport to 4.2-stable ] Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c index 603146e..9d42aeb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_device *dev) static int i915_drm_resume_early(struct drm_device *dev) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; - int ret = 0; + int ret; /* * We have a resume ordering issue with the snd-hda driver also @@ -807,6 +807,36 @@ static int i915_drm_resume_early(struct drm_device *dev) * FIXME: This should be solved with a special hdmi sink device or * similar so that power domains can be employed. */ + + /* + * Note that we need to set the power state explicitly, since we + * powered off the device during freeze and the PCI core won't power + * it back up for us during thaw. Powering off the device during + * freeze is not a hard requirement though, and during the + * suspend/resume phases the PCI core makes sure we get here with the + * device powered on. So in case we change our freeze logic and keep + * the device powered we can also remove the following set power state + * call. + */ + ret = pci_set_power_state(dev->pdev, PCI_D0); + if (ret) { + DRM_ERROR("failed to set PCI D0 power state (%d)\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + /* + * Note that pci_enable_device() first enables any parent bridge + * device and only then sets the power state for this device. The + * bridge enabling is a nop though, since bridge devices are resumed + * first. The order of enabling power and enabling the device is + * imposed by the PCI core as described above, so here we preserve the + * same order for the freeze/thaw phases. + * + * TODO: eventually we should remove pci_disable_device() / + * pci_enable_enable_device() from suspend/resume. Due to how they + * depend on the device enable refcount we can't anyway depend on them + * disabling/enabling the device. + */ if (pci_enable_device(dev->pdev)) return -EIO; -- 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html