Re: [PATCH 1/1] firmware: correct test of wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout return

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Mario Limonciello
<mario_limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Before this commit both code paths (hotplug and not-hotplug as determined
> by FW_OPT_UEVENT)  would block on an interruptible completion, but the
> hotplugscenario also would wait until timeout and then abort.  The non
> hotplugscenario (which dell-rbu followed) would block indefinitely until
> interrupted.
>
> After this commit both scenarios block on an interruptible condition but
> the hotplug scenario follows the value of firmware_loading_timeout to end.
> This changed the situation for the non hotplug scenario to instead wait
> for MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET.  This should have the same result, but dell-rbu was
> failing with negative values returned from
> wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout after completion occurred.
>
> This shouldn't be possible, but it was happening because the return is a
> long but the value it was being saved to was an int.  When completion
> occurs quickly wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout returns how much
> time was left (which happens to be a very big number since the timeout was
> MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET) One test run of mine returned 4611686018427368747.
>
> Other parts of the kernel with this type of return don't have problems
> because they use smaller timeouts.
>
> So to fix this: change the test to not store the value to an int, but
> rather directly compare against what
> wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout can return.
>
> Fixes: 68ff2a00dbf59 (firmware_loader: handle timeout via wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout())
> CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: stuart_hayes@xxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> index 773fc30..223af70 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> @@ -917,14 +917,11 @@ static int _request_firmware_load(struct firmware_priv *fw_priv,
>                 timeout = MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET;
>         }
>
> -       retval = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&buf->completion,
> -                       timeout);
> -       if (retval == -ERESTARTSYS || !retval) {
> +       if (wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&buf->completion,
> +                                               timeout) <= 0) {
>                 mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
>                 fw_load_abort(fw_priv);
>                 mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> -       } else if (retval > 0) {
> -               retval = 0;
>         }

Good catch, thanks!

Acked-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
>         if (is_fw_load_aborted(buf))
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]