On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 06:17:17PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > ... instead of the previous ORIGIN_GTT. This should actually > invalidate FBC once something is written on the frontbuffer using WC > mmaps. The problem with ORIGIN_GTT is that the automatic hardware > tracking is not able to detect the WC writes as it can detect the GTT > writes. > > This should help fix the SKL bug where nothing happens when you type > your username/password on lightdm. > > This patch was originally pasted on an email by Chris and converted to > an actual git patch by Paulo. > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.6 > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> This is From: Chris but lacks his sob. Can't merge as-is, pls ask him for his sob on irc. > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > index dd18772..17b42a8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > @@ -2157,6 +2157,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object { > unsigned int cache_dirty:1; > > unsigned int frontbuffer_bits:INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS; > + unsigned int has_wc_mmap:1; > > unsigned int pin_display; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index 40f90c7..bfafa07 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > @@ -1608,6 +1608,13 @@ static struct intel_rps_client *to_rps_client(struct drm_file *file) > return &fpriv->rps; > } > > +static enum fb_op_origin > +write_origin(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, unsigned domain) > +{ > + return domain == I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT && !obj->has_wc_mmap ? > + ORIGIN_GTT : ORIGIN_CPU; > +} > + > /** > * Called when user space prepares to use an object with the CPU, either > * through the mmap ioctl's mapping or a GTT mapping. > @@ -1661,9 +1668,7 @@ i915_gem_set_domain_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain(obj, write_domain != 0); > > if (write_domain != 0) > - intel_fb_obj_invalidate(obj, > - write_domain == I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT ? > - ORIGIN_GTT : ORIGIN_CPU); > + intel_fb_obj_invalidate(obj, write_origin(obj, write_domain)); > > unref: > drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base); > @@ -1761,6 +1766,9 @@ i915_gem_mmap_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > else > addr = -ENOMEM; > up_write(&mm->mmap_sem); > + > + /* This may race, but that's ok, it only gets set */ This comment doesn't mesh with the unsigned int has_wc_mmap:1; above. If you depend upon atomicity of writes at the hw level, your struct member _must_ be a full machine word. Which in practice means /* * IMPORTANT: We have unlocked access to this, this must be a * stand-alone bool. */ bool has_wc_mmap; You can only fold together different bitfields into one if they're _all_ protected by the same lock. gcc needs to generate read-modify-write cycles to write them, which means if any of them are accessed through a separate lock or lock-lessly, there's a real race. With that fixed (and assuming the ABI fix has still Chris' ack/sob): Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > + to_intel_bo(obj)->has_wc_mmap = true; > } > drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(obj); > if (IS_ERR((void *)addr)) > -- > 2.8.0.rc3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html