From: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@xxxxxxxxx> This patch has been added to the 3.12 stable tree. If you have any objections, please let us know. =============== commit 03a59437ef6b6ad7fb0165cb9b96c08d6bf057fc upstream. As stated by the eMMC 5.0 specification, a chip should not be rejected only because of the revision stated in the EXT_CSD_REV field of the EXT_CSD register. Remove the control on this value, the control of the CSD_STRUCTURE field should be sufficient to reject future incompatible changes. Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> --- drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c index 6d02012a1d0b..36d6701de972 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c @@ -292,13 +292,12 @@ static int mmc_read_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *ext_csd) } } + /* + * The EXT_CSD format is meant to be forward compatible. As long + * as CSD_STRUCTURE does not change, all values for EXT_CSD_REV + * are authorized, see JEDEC JESD84-B50 section B.8. + */ card->ext_csd.rev = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_REV]; - if (card->ext_csd.rev > 7) { - pr_err("%s: unrecognised EXT_CSD revision %d\n", - mmc_hostname(card->host), card->ext_csd.rev); - err = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } card->ext_csd.raw_sectors[0] = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT + 0]; card->ext_csd.raw_sectors[1] = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT + 1]; -- 2.8.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html