Hey Willy, On 04/21/2016 03:11 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > This illustrates exactly what I suspected would happen because that's the > same trouble we all face when picking backports for our respective trees > except that since the selection barrier is much higher here, lots of > important ones will be missing Right. I fully agree that there will be important security commits that'll get missed, whether because they were missed in the stable selection or the stable-security selection. I'd like to point out again that updating the entire stable tree is the preferable way to patch against security (and non-security) issues. The stable-security tree is a best-effort solution to provide a stop-gap in between said stable tree updates. Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html