Hi Vladis,
>> Why "usbvision: revert commit 588afcc1" is not accepted in linux-media ?
>
> As mentioned in a message from Hans down this thread, it "fell through the cracks",
> unfortunately. (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg99495.html)
I understand.
Thank you for you reply.
Regards,
Yuki Machida
On 2016年04月18日 18:20, Vladis Dronov wrote:
Hello, Yuki, all,
Why "usbvision: revert commit 588afcc1" is not accepted in linux-media ?
As mentioned in a message from Hans down this thread, it "fell through the cracks",
unfortunately. (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg99495.html)
Best regards,
Vladis Dronov | Red Hat, Inc. | Product Security Engineer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yuki Machida" <machida.yuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Vladis Dronov" <vdronov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "sasha levin" <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx, oneukum@xxxxxxxx, mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 10:32:12 AM
Subject: Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1
Hi Vladis,
On 2016年04月15日 18:55, Vladis Dronov wrote:
Hello, Yuki, all,
My commit fa52bd506f resolves CVE-2015-7833, as mentioned in
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg96936.html
I understand that commit fa52bd506f resolved security issue of CVE-2015-7833
and commit 588afcc1 is not needed for fixing of CVE-2015-7833.
Please, note a message from Hans down this thread, who agrees
with my point.
I understand the opinion of Vladis and Hans.
Why "usbvision: revert commit 588afcc1" is not accepted in linux-media ?
Regards,
Yuki Machida
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html