[PATCH 4.4 049/137] qlcnic: Remove unnecessary usage of atomic_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Rajesh Borundia <rajesh.borundia@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 5bf93251cee1fb66141d1d2eaff86e04a9397bdf ]

o atomic_t usage is incorrect as we are not implementing
any atomicity.

Signed-off-by: Rajesh Borundia <rajesh.borundia@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic.h         |    2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_83xx_hw.c |    9 ++++-----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic.h
@@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ struct qlcnic_mailbox {
 	unsigned long		status;
 	spinlock_t		queue_lock;	/* Mailbox queue lock */
 	spinlock_t		aen_lock;	/* Mailbox response/AEN lock */
-	atomic_t		rsp_status;
+	u32			rsp_status;
 	u32			num_cmds;
 };
 
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_83xx_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_83xx_hw.c
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ irqreturn_t qlcnic_83xx_clear_legacy_int
 
 static inline void qlcnic_83xx_notify_mbx_response(struct qlcnic_mailbox *mbx)
 {
-	atomic_set(&mbx->rsp_status, QLC_83XX_MBX_RESPONSE_ARRIVED);
+	mbx->rsp_status = QLC_83XX_MBX_RESPONSE_ARRIVED;
 	complete(&mbx->completion);
 }
 
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void qlcnic_83xx_poll_process_aen
 	if (event &  QLCNIC_MBX_ASYNC_EVENT) {
 		__qlcnic_83xx_process_aen(adapter);
 	} else {
-		if (atomic_read(&mbx->rsp_status) != rsp_status)
+		if (mbx->rsp_status != rsp_status)
 			qlcnic_83xx_notify_mbx_response(mbx);
 	}
 out:
@@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@ static void qlcnic_83xx_process_aen(stru
 		if (event &  QLCNIC_MBX_ASYNC_EVENT) {
 			__qlcnic_83xx_process_aen(adapter);
 		} else {
-			if (atomic_read(&mbx->rsp_status) != rsp_status)
+			if (mbx->rsp_status != rsp_status)
 				qlcnic_83xx_notify_mbx_response(mbx);
 		}
 	}
@@ -4050,7 +4050,6 @@ static void qlcnic_83xx_mailbox_worker(s
 	struct qlcnic_adapter *adapter = mbx->adapter;
 	const struct qlcnic_mbx_ops *mbx_ops = mbx->ops;
 	struct device *dev = &adapter->pdev->dev;
-	atomic_t *rsp_status = &mbx->rsp_status;
 	struct list_head *head = &mbx->cmd_q;
 	struct qlcnic_hardware_context *ahw;
 	struct qlcnic_cmd_args *cmd = NULL;
@@ -4063,7 +4062,7 @@ static void qlcnic_83xx_mailbox_worker(s
 			return;
 		}
 
-		atomic_set(rsp_status, QLC_83XX_MBX_RESPONSE_WAIT);
+		mbx->rsp_status = QLC_83XX_MBX_RESPONSE_WAIT;
 
 		spin_lock(&mbx->queue_lock);
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]