3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Bill Sommerfeld <wsommerfeld@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 59dca1d8a6725a121dae6c452de0b2611d5865dc ] IPv4 interprets a negative return value from a protocol handler as a request to redispatch to a new protocol. In contrast, IPv6 interprets a negative value as an error, and interprets a positive value as a request for redispatch. UDP for IPv6 was unaware of this difference. Change __udp6_lib_rcv() to return a positive value for redispatch. Note that the socket's encap_rcv hook still needs to return a negative value to request dispatch, and in the case of IPv6 packets, adjust IP6CB(skb)->nhoff to identify the byte containing the next protocol. Signed-off-by: Bill Sommerfeld <wsommerfeld@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/ipv6/udp.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/net/ipv6/udp.c +++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c @@ -868,11 +868,9 @@ int __udp6_lib_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, ret = udpv6_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb); sock_put(sk); - /* a return value > 0 means to resubmit the input, but - * it wants the return to be -protocol, or 0 - */ + /* a return value > 0 means to resubmit the input */ if (ret > 0) - return -ret; + return ret; return 0; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html