On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:39:26PM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote: > In a message of Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:39:32 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > >3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > >From: Anders Hammarquist <iko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > >commit 35a2fbc941accd0e9f1bfadd669311786118d874 upstream. > > > >Add product id for Abbott strip port cable for Precision meter which > >uses the TI 3410 chip. > > Given the statically sized arrays, I think this patch should not go in > alone. It needs to go together with the later patches I sent you that > fix the array sizing. > > (this applies to all trees) Yes, but, thanks to the fact that you are only adding one more device id, I don't think we are overflowing anything with this patch alone, right? The only "bad" thing that could happen here is if a user specifies a device/vendor id on the module command line, is it would replace the device id you added, so all should be fine. Or am I reading the code wrong? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html