Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: do not leak guest xcr0 into host interrupt handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 05/04/2016 17:56, David Matlack wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
> ...
>>
>> While running my acceptance tests, in one case I got one CPU whose xcr0
>> had leaked into the host.  This showed up as a SIGILL in strncasecmp's
>> AVX code, and a simple program confirmed it:
>>
>>     $ cat xgetbv.c
>>     #include <stdio.h>
>>     int main(void)
>>     {
>>         unsigned xcr0_h, xcr0_l;
>>         asm("xgetbv" : "=d"(xcr0_h), "=a"(xcr0_l) : "c"(0));
>>         printf("%08x:%08x\n", xcr0_h, xcr0_l);
>>     }
>>     $ gcc xgetbv.c -O2
>>     $ for i in `seq 0 55`; do echo $i `taskset -c $i ./a.out`; done|grep -v 007
>>     19 00000000:00000003
>>
>> I'm going to rerun the tests without this patch, as it seems the most
>> likely culprit, and leave it out of the pull request if they pass.
> 
> Agreed this is a very likely culprit. I think I see one way the
> guest's xcr0 can leak into the host.

That's cancel_injection, right?  If it's just about moving the load call
below, I can do that.  Hmm, I will even test that today. :)

Paolo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]