Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 10:25:13 +0200
Cc: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx>, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxx>, Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <56FFC06F.70108@cogentembedded.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

>    And I still don't feel good about the patch removing the spinlock -- I'm
> not sure it's SMP-safe...

In what scenario?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov

References:
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early
  - From: Sergei Shtylyov