4.2.8-ckt6 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ---8<------------------------------------------------------------ From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@xxxxxxxxx> commit 45d11738969633ec07ca35d75d486bf2d8918df6 upstream. After rename file dentry still holds reference to lower dentry from previous location. This doesn't matter for data access because data comes from upper dentry. But this stale lower dentry taints dentry at new location and turns it into non-pure upper. Such file leaves visible whiteout entry after remove in directory which shouldn't have whiteouts at all. Overlayfs already tracks pureness of file location in oe->opaque. This patch just uses that for detecting actual path type. Comment from Vivek Goyal's patch: Here are the details of the problem. Do following. $ mkdir upper lower work merged upper/dir/ $ touch lower/test $ sudo mount -t overlay overlay -olowerdir=lower,upperdir=upper,workdir= work merged $ mv merged/test merged/dir/ $ rm merged/dir/test $ ls -l merged/dir/ /usr/bin/ls: cannot access merged/dir/test: No such file or directory total 0 c????????? ? ? ? ? ? test Basic problem seems to be that once a file has been unlinked, a whiteout has been left behind which was not needed and hence it becomes visible. Whiteout is visible because parent dir is of not type MERGE, hence od->is_real is set during ovl_dir_open(). And that means ovl_iterate() passes on iterate handling directly to underlying fs. Underlying fs does not know/filter whiteouts so it becomes visible to user. Why did we leave a whiteout to begin with when we should not have. ovl_do_remove() checks for OVL_TYPE_PURE_UPPER() and does not leave whiteout if file is pure upper. In this case file is not found to be pure upper hence whiteout is left. So why file was not PURE_UPPER in this case? I think because dentry is still carrying some leftover state which was valid before rename. For example, od->numlower was set to 1 as it was a lower file. After rename, this state is not valid anymore as there is no such file in lower. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@xxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: Viktor Stanchev <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Suggested-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109611 Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/overlayfs/dir.c | 7 +++++++ fs/overlayfs/super.c | 12 +++++++----- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c index 36d6a5b..a2b1d7c 100644 --- a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c @@ -904,6 +904,13 @@ static int ovl_rename2(struct inode *olddir, struct dentry *old, if (!overwrite && new_is_dir && !old_opaque && new_opaque) ovl_remove_opaque(newdentry); + /* + * Old dentry now lives in different location. Dentries in + * lowerstack are stale. We cannot drop them here because + * access to them is lockless. This could be only pure upper + * or opaque directory - numlower is zero. Or upper non-dir + * entry - its pureness is tracked by flag opaque. + */ if (old_opaque != new_opaque) { ovl_dentry_set_opaque(old, new_opaque); if (!overwrite) diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c index 96a122f..000b2ed 100644 --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c @@ -76,12 +76,14 @@ enum ovl_path_type ovl_path_type(struct dentry *dentry) if (oe->__upperdentry) { type = __OVL_PATH_UPPER; - if (oe->numlower) { - if (S_ISDIR(dentry->d_inode->i_mode)) - type |= __OVL_PATH_MERGE; - } else if (!oe->opaque) { + /* + * Non-dir dentry can hold lower dentry from previous + * location. Its purity depends only on opaque flag. + */ + if (oe->numlower && S_ISDIR(dentry->d_inode->i_mode)) + type |= __OVL_PATH_MERGE; + else if (!oe->opaque) type |= __OVL_PATH_PURE; - } } else { if (oe->numlower > 1) type |= __OVL_PATH_MERGE; -- 2.7.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html