4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 9acc54beb474c81148e2946603d141cf8716b19f upstream.
Just like for CCMP we need to check that for GCMP the fragments
have PNs that increment by one; the spec was updated to fix this
security issue and now has the following text:
The receiver shall discard MSDUs and MMPDUs whose constituent
MPDU PN values are not incrementing in steps of 1.
Adapt the code for CCMP to work for GCMP as well, luckily the
relevant fields already alias each other so no code duplication
is needed (just check the aliasing with BUILD_BUG_ON.)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h | 2 +-
net/mac80211/rx.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
+++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct ieee80211_fragment_entry {
u16 extra_len;
u16 last_frag;
u8 rx_queue;
- bool ccmp; /* Whether fragments were encrypted with CCMP */
+ bool check_sequential_pn; /* needed for CCMP/GCMP */
u8 last_pn[6]; /* PN of the last fragment if CCMP was used */
};
--- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
@@ -1754,7 +1754,7 @@ ieee80211_reassemble_add(struct ieee8021
entry->seq = seq;
entry->rx_queue = rx_queue;
entry->last_frag = frag;
- entry->ccmp = 0;
+ entry->check_sequential_pn = false;
entry->extra_len = 0;
return entry;
@@ -1850,15 +1850,27 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_defragment(struct ieee802
rx->seqno_idx, &(rx->skb));
if (rx->key &&
(rx->key->conf.cipher == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP ||
- rx->key->conf.cipher == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP_256) &&
+ rx->key->conf.cipher == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP_256 ||
+ rx->key->conf.cipher == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_GCMP ||
+ rx->key->conf.cipher == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_GCMP_256) &&
ieee80211_has_protected(fc)) {
int queue = rx->security_idx;
- /* Store CCMP PN so that we can verify that the next
- * fragment has a sequential PN value. */
- entry->ccmp = 1;
+
+ /* Store CCMP/GCMP PN so that we can verify that the
+ * next fragment has a sequential PN value.
+ */
+ entry->check_sequential_pn = true;
memcpy(entry->last_pn,
rx->key->u.ccmp.rx_pn[queue],
IEEE80211_CCMP_PN_LEN);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct ieee80211_key,
+ u.ccmp.rx_pn) !=
+ offsetof(struct ieee80211_key,
+ u.gcmp.rx_pn));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rx->key->u.ccmp.rx_pn[queue]) !=
+ sizeof(rx->key->u.gcmp.rx_pn[queue]));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(IEEE80211_CCMP_PN_LEN !=
+ IEEE80211_GCMP_PN_LEN);
}
return RX_QUEUED;
}
@@ -1873,15 +1885,21 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_defragment(struct ieee802
return RX_DROP_MONITOR;
}
- /* Verify that MPDUs within one MSDU have sequential PN values.
- * (IEEE 802.11i, 8.3.3.4.5) */
- if (entry->ccmp) {
+ /* "The receiver shall discard MSDUs and MMPDUs whose constituent
+ * MPDU PN values are not incrementing in steps of 1."
+ * see IEEE P802.11-REVmc/D5.0, 12.5.3.4.4, item d (for CCMP)
+ * and IEEE P802.11-REVmc/D5.0, 12.5.5.4.4, item d (for GCMP)
+ */
+ if (entry->check_sequential_pn) {
int i;
u8 pn[IEEE80211_CCMP_PN_LEN], *rpn;
int queue;
+
if (!rx->key ||
(rx->key->conf.cipher != WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP &&
- rx->key->conf.cipher != WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP_256))
+ rx->key->conf.cipher != WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP_256 &&
+ rx->key->conf.cipher != WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_GCMP &&
+ rx->key->conf.cipher != WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_GCMP_256))
return RX_DROP_UNUSABLE;
memcpy(pn, entry->last_pn, IEEE80211_CCMP_PN_LEN);
for (i = IEEE80211_CCMP_PN_LEN - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html