> On 12 mrt. 2016, at 13:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 08:51:26AM +0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>> On 8 March 2016 at 20:45, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 8 March 2016 at 20:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:40:14PM +0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>>>> On 8 March 2016 at 07:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Please hold off on this one. We are seeing some breakage on 64k pages systems >>>> >>>> If this problem is also in Linus's tree, I'd like to keep it in to keep >>>> things "bug compatible". Please let me know what fix that I should >>>> apply to resolve this. >>> >>> I am about to send out the patch that should fix this, so I will put you on cc. >> >> Not sure what happened here, but this patch is in 4.4-stable now, but >> the fix is not. > > Because the fix came out _after_ I released that kernel? I can't go > back in time... > I kind of got the whole chronology thing. I am just surprised you pulled only that patch (and not the fix) anyway, since you knew it would break things, and that a fix was on the way.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html