3.19.8-ckt16 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit e62a123b8ef7c5dc4db2c16383d506860ad21b47 ]
Neal reported crashes with this stack trace :
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8c57231b>] tcp_v4_send_ack+0x41/0x20f
...
CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 000000044005c000 CR4: 00000000001427e0
...
[<ffffffff8c57258e>] tcp_v4_reqsk_send_ack+0xa5/0xb4
[<ffffffff8c1a7caa>] tcp_check_req+0x2ea/0x3e0
[<ffffffff8c19e420>] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x850/0x2500
[<ffffffff8c1a6d21>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x141/0x330
[<ffffffff8c56cdb2>] sk_backlog_rcv+0x21/0x30
[<ffffffff8c098bbd>] tcp_recvmsg+0x75d/0xf90
[<ffffffff8c0a8700>] inet_recvmsg+0x80/0xa0
[<ffffffff8c17623e>] sock_aio_read+0xee/0x110
[<ffffffff8c066fcf>] do_sync_read+0x6f/0xa0
[<ffffffff8c0673a1>] SyS_read+0x1e1/0x290
[<ffffffff8c5ca262>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
The problem here is the skb we provide to tcp_v4_send_ack() had to
be parked in the backlog of a new TCP fastopen child because this child
was owned by the user at the time an out of window packet arrived.
Before queuing a packet, TCP has to set skb->dev to NULL as the device
could disappear before packet is removed from the queue.
Fix this issue by using the net pointer provided by the socket (being a
timewait or a request socket).
IPv6 is immune to the bug : tcp_v6_send_response() already gets the net
pointer from the socket if provided.
Fixes: 168a8f58059a ("tcp: TCP Fast Open Server - main code path")
Reported-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jerry Chu <hkchu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 7a8a674..c338598 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -704,7 +704,8 @@ release_sk1:
outside socket context is ugly, certainly. What can I do?
*/
-static void tcp_v4_send_ack(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack,
+static void tcp_v4_send_ack(struct net *net,
+ struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack,
u32 win, u32 tsval, u32 tsecr, int oif,
struct tcp_md5sig_key *key,
int reply_flags, u8 tos)
@@ -719,7 +720,6 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_ack(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack,
];
} rep;
struct ip_reply_arg arg;
- struct net *net = dev_net(skb_dst(skb)->dev);
memset(&rep.th, 0, sizeof(struct tcphdr));
memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
@@ -781,7 +781,8 @@ static void tcp_v4_timewait_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct inet_timewait_sock *tw = inet_twsk(sk);
struct tcp_timewait_sock *tcptw = tcp_twsk(sk);
- tcp_v4_send_ack(skb, tcptw->tw_snd_nxt, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt,
+ tcp_v4_send_ack(sock_net(sk), skb,
+ tcptw->tw_snd_nxt, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt,
tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd >> tw->tw_rcv_wscale,
tcp_time_stamp + tcptw->tw_ts_offset,
tcptw->tw_ts_recent,
@@ -800,8 +801,10 @@ static void tcp_v4_reqsk_send_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN -> for regular TCP_SYN_RECV
* sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV -> for Fast Open.
*/
- tcp_v4_send_ack(skb, (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) ?
- tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn + 1 : tcp_sk(sk)->snd_nxt,
+ u32 seq = (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) ? tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn + 1 :
+ tcp_sk(sk)->snd_nxt;
+
+ tcp_v4_send_ack(sock_net(sk), skb, seq,
tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_nxt, req->rcv_wnd,
tcp_time_stamp,
req->ts_recent,
--
2.7.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html