Hello, On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 17:38:11 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > And from clk_enable comment we have: > "" > clk_enable must not sleep, which differentiates it from clk_prepare. In a > simple case, clk_enable can be used instead of clk_prepare to ungate a clk > if the operation will never sleep. > "" > > Moreoever for me the "must" was to insist to the order of the call no to > the fact that both must be called. Right make sense, thanks for correcting me on this. If that's OK from a clock maintainer point of view, I'm fine. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html