3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 9f12600fe425bc28f0ccba034a77783c09c15af4 upstream.
lock_parent() very much on purpose does nested locking of dentries, and
is careful to maintain the right order (lock parent first). But because
it didn't annotate the nested locking order, lockdep thought it might be
a deadlock on d_lock, and complained.
Add the proper annotation for the inner locking of the child dentry to
make lockdep happy.
Introduced by commit 046b961b45f9 ("shrink_dentry_list(): take parent's
->d_lock earlier").
Reported-and-tested-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/dcache.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ again:
}
rcu_read_unlock();
if (parent != dentry)
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
else
parent = NULL;
return parent;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html