This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/dp/mst: always send reply for UP request
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-dp-mst-always-send-reply-for-up-request.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 1f16ee7fa13649f4e55aa48ad31c3eb0722a62d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:14:43 -0500
Subject: drm/dp/mst: always send reply for UP request
From: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@xxxxxxx>
commit 1f16ee7fa13649f4e55aa48ad31c3eb0722a62d3 upstream.
We should always send reply for UP request in order
to make downstream device clean-up resources appropriately.
Issue was that reply for UP request was sent only once.
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -1489,26 +1489,18 @@ static void process_single_down_tx_qlock
}
/* called holding qlock */
-static void process_single_up_tx_qlock(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
+static void process_single_up_tx_qlock(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
+ struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg)
{
- struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg;
int ret;
/* construct a chunk from the first msg in the tx_msg queue */
- if (list_empty(&mgr->tx_msg_upq)) {
- mgr->tx_up_in_progress = false;
- return;
- }
-
- txmsg = list_first_entry(&mgr->tx_msg_upq, struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx, next);
ret = process_single_tx_qlock(mgr, txmsg, true);
- if (ret == 1) {
- /* up txmsgs aren't put in slots - so free after we send it */
- list_del(&txmsg->next);
- kfree(txmsg);
- } else if (ret)
+
+ if (ret != 1)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to send msg in q %d\n", ret);
- mgr->tx_up_in_progress = true;
+
+ txmsg->dst->tx_slots[txmsg->seqno] = NULL;
}
static void drm_dp_queue_down_tx(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
@@ -1895,11 +1887,12 @@ static int drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(stru
drm_dp_encode_up_ack_reply(txmsg, req_type);
mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
- list_add_tail(&txmsg->next, &mgr->tx_msg_upq);
- if (!mgr->tx_up_in_progress) {
- process_single_up_tx_qlock(mgr);
- }
+
+ process_single_up_tx_qlock(mgr, txmsg);
+
mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
+
+ kfree(txmsg);
return 0;
}
@@ -2809,7 +2802,6 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(struct
mutex_init(&mgr->qlock);
mutex_init(&mgr->payload_lock);
mutex_init(&mgr->destroy_connector_lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->tx_msg_upq);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->tx_msg_downq);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mgr->destroy_connector_list);
INIT_WORK(&mgr->work, drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work);
--- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
@@ -450,9 +450,7 @@ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr {
the mstb tx_slots and txmsg->state once they are queued */
struct mutex qlock;
struct list_head tx_msg_downq;
- struct list_head tx_msg_upq;
bool tx_down_in_progress;
- bool tx_up_in_progress;
/* payload info + lock for it */
struct mutex payload_lock;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from Mykola.Lysenko@xxxxxxx are
queue-4.4/drm-dp-mst-deallocate-payload-on-port-destruction.patch
queue-4.4/drm-dp-mst-process-broadcast-messages-correctly.patch
queue-4.4/drm-dp-mst-fix-in-rad-element-access.patch
queue-4.4/drm-dp-mst-always-send-reply-for-up-request.patch
queue-4.4/drm-dp-mst-fix-in-mstb-rad-initialization.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html