Re: [lttng-dev] [-stable 3.8.1 performance regression] madvise POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andrew Morton (akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:39:36 -0400 Rapha__l Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 2013/6/17 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > > That change wasn't terribly efficient - if there are any unpopulated
> > > pages in the range (which is quite likely), fadvise() will now always
> > > call invalidate_mapping_pages() a second time.
> > >
> > > Perhaps this is fixable.  Say, make lru_add_drain_all() return a
> > > success code, or even teach lru_add_drain_all() to return a code
> > > indicating that one of the spilled pages was (or might have been) on a
> > > particular mapping.
> > >
> > 
> > Following our tests results, that was the call to lru_add_drain_all() that
> > causes the problem. The second call to invalidate_mapping_pages() isn't
> > really important. We tried to compile a kernel with the commit introducing
> > this change but with the "lru_add_drain_all()" line removed, and the
> > problem disappeared, even if we called two times invalidate_mapping_pages()
> > (as the rest of the commit was still here).
> 
> Ah, OK, schedule_on_each_cpu() could certainly do that - it has to wait
> for every CPU to context switch and schedule the worker function.
> 
> There's a lot we could do here.  Such as not doing the schedule_work()
> at all for a cpu which has an empty lru_add_pvec.

First approach proposed, submitted as RFC. Compile-tested only.

---
 mm/swap.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/mm/swap.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/swap.c
+++ linux/mm/swap.c
@@ -652,7 +652,40 @@ static void lru_add_drain_per_cpu(struct
  */
 int lru_add_drain_all(void)
 {
-	return schedule_on_each_cpu(lru_add_drain_per_cpu);
+	int cpu;
+	struct work_struct __percpu *works;
+
+	works = alloc_percpu(struct work_struct);
+	if (!works)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	get_online_cpus();
+
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct pagevec *pvecs = per_cpu(lru_add_pvecs, cpu);
+		struct work_struct *work = per_cpu_ptr(works, cpu);
+		struct pagevec *pvec;
+		int lru;
+
+		INIT_WORK(work, lru_add_drain_per_cpu);
+		for_each_lru(lru) {
+			pvec = &pvecs[lru - LRU_BASE];
+			if (pagevec_count(pvec)) {
+				schedule_work_on(cpu, work);
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct work_struct *work = per_cpu_ptr(works, cpu);
+		if (work_pending(work))
+			flush_work(work);
+	}
+
+	put_online_cpus();
+	free_percpu(works);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*

> Or even pass down
> the address_space and only schedule the work for CPUs which have a page
> from *this mapping* in their lru_add_pvec.  That will all be highly
> racy, but as long as the failure mode is "flushed unnecessarily" then
> that's OK.

Second approach, submitted as RFC with some questions left unanswered
in the code. Compile-tested only.

---
 include/linux/swap.h |    1 
 mm/fadvise.c         |    2 -
 mm/swap.c            |   62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/include/linux/swap.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/swap.h
+++ linux/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ extern void mark_page_accessed(struct pa
 extern void lru_add_drain(void);
 extern void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu);
 extern int lru_add_drain_all(void);
+extern int lru_add_drain_mapping(struct address_space *mapping);
 extern void rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page);
 extern void deactivate_page(struct page *page);
 extern void swap_setup(void);
Index: linux/mm/swap.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/swap.c
+++ linux/mm/swap.c
@@ -689,6 +689,68 @@ int lru_add_drain_all(void)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Returns 0 for success
+ */
+int lru_add_drain_mapping(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+	int cpu;
+	struct work_struct __percpu *works;
+
+	works = alloc_percpu(struct work_struct);
+	if (!works)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	get_online_cpus();
+
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct pagevec *pvecs = per_cpu(lru_add_pvecs, cpu);
+		struct work_struct *work = per_cpu_ptr(works, cpu);
+		struct pagevec *pvec;
+		int lru;
+
+		INIT_WORK(work, lru_add_drain_per_cpu);
+		for_each_lru(lru) {
+			int i;
+
+			pvec = &pvecs[lru - LRU_BASE];
+			/*
+			 * Race failure mode is to flush unnecessarily.
+			 * We use PAGEVEC_SIZE rather than pvec->nr to
+			 * stay on the safe-side wrt pvec resize.
+			 */
+			for (i = 0; i < PAGEVEC_SIZE; i++) {
+				struct page *page;
+
+				/*
+				 * Racy access to page. TODO: is it OK
+				 * to access it from the remote CPU's
+				 * lru without any kind of ownership or
+				 * synchronization ?
+				 */
+				page = ACCESS_ONCE(pvec->pages[i]);
+				if (!pvec->pages[i])
+					continue;
+				if (page->mapping == mapping) {
+					schedule_work_on(cpu, work);
+					goto next_cpu;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	next_cpu: ;	/* TODO: coding ugliness */
+	}
+
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct work_struct *work = per_cpu_ptr(works, cpu);
+		if (work_pending(work))
+			flush_work(work);
+	}
+
+	put_online_cpus();
+	free_percpu(works);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
  * Batched page_cache_release().  Decrement the reference count on all the
  * passed pages.  If it fell to zero then remove the page from the LRU and
  * free it.
Index: linux/mm/fadvise.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/fadvise.c
+++ linux/mm/fadvise.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(fadvise64_64, int, fd, l
 			 * pagevecs and try again.
 			 */
 			if (count < (end_index - start_index + 1)) {
-				lru_add_drain_all();
+				lru_add_drain_mapping(mapping);
 				invalidate_mapping_pages(mapping, start_index,
 						end_index);
 			}

Feedback is welcome,

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]